Scholé news | On 5G
Over the past year I have looked closely into the issue of 5G,
above all its planned introduction. Anyone who studies the subject for long enough must conclude that a worldwide experiment on human beings is under way. As citizens of a democratic country, where this is still possible, we should definitely object! That is why, for once, I am forwarding to all of you the letter of a courageous young activist.
The IT corporations, which stand to gain unimaginable power over the population of the earth through the new 5G technology, have so far not had to submit a single study on the health effects of their new global system for mobile communication, control, steering and manipulation. The licensing authorities have negligently not even demanded precise information on which frequencies and applications are actually hidden behind the product name 5G.
It is a fact that not a single insurance company in the world is prepared to cover the risk of any effects of the new technology. It is a fact that the pulsed radiation used for 5G was originally developed for military purposes and has already been used successfully for them. It is a fact that countless new transmitter antennas have to be built for 5G to operate, and that numerous trees have to be sacrificed for them. It is a fact that people who are sensitive to radiation will no longer find refuge anywhere, because satellites are meant to carry 5G radiation into the furthest corners of the earth.
The teacher, journalist and activist Steven Whybrow has summarised all the information he was able to gather on 5G in a letter to the Austrian authorities. With it he justifies his refusal to give his consent to this global experiment on humanity. This, he argues, makes the officials personally liable for any consequences. Since the Nuremberg trials after the Second World War, our legal order has provided that experiments on human beings may not be carried out without their express consent.
In purely legal terms, the objection of a single citizen is enough to prevent the authorities from relying on the “tacit consent” of the population. But the protest against the disregard of our rights and the progressive destruction of nature for the sake of the hoped-for bonanza of the Internet of Things would certainly be more effective if as many like-minded people as possible joined in – in whatever form.
Notes on content provided by authors
Comments
Loading comments …
Become a member to comment publicly. GAIA members write comments in the members' portal — under their nickname, visible to everyone.
