The multi-paradigm shift becomes visible, part V: How free is "free energy"?

The multi-paradigm shift becomes visible – part V: How free is “free energy”?

Our conventional sciences mostly depict closed systems and generalise certain phenomena that can only be observed in closed systems into “laws of nature”. One constantly repeated principle is that a so-called “perpetuum mobile” – a device which, once set in motion, can run “for ever” without any further supply of energy and possibly even generate additional energy in the process – is “impossible”. Depending on which “law of thermodynamics” such a construction violates, one then speaks of “perpetual motion machines of the 1st to 3rd kind”.

It is interesting, however, that as early as 1150 the Indian mathematician Bhaskara devised an “unbalanced wheel” which, by making use of gravity and with the weights placed at unequal distances from the axle, apparently keeps a wheel turning “for ever”:

In 1712 the clockmaker Johann Bessler developed the “Bessler wheel”, which could also perform work and supposedly once ran without interruption for 54 days. In 1823 Mackintosh used a permanent magnet to patent another wheel that ran “for ever”:

Today there are even whole YouTube channels and blogs that have made it their task to spread knowledge of the “physical possibility of the perpetuum mobile”:

YOUTUBE CHANNEL VEPROJECT VEPROJECT WEBSITE

In his book “Die Energierevolution” (The energy revolution, German), published in 2017, the inventor Heinrich Schmid published construction plans with which anyone can build an “energy converter” that delivers six times the energy required to start it. To this day, no conventional physicist has raised any objection to this apparatus, which is based on the propagation of waves in a medium.

BOOK: DIE ENERGIE REVOLUTION (German)

So is “free energy” actually possible?

What exactly do we mean by “free energy” in the first place? To begin with, the following meanings of the term “free energy” are conceivable:

1. Cost-free energy, i.e. energy whose generation and use require no financial outlay. Examples are the incineration of waste or biomass, where disposal costs can even be saved.
2. Regenerable energy, i.e. energy that manages without destroying substances or other forms of energy, or where these are formed anew in the course of the process or outside it, or form themselves anew. Examples would be solar and wind energy, but also energy from renewable raw materials such as biodiesel.
3. Permanent energy, i.e. a form of energy that is constantly present in abundance “in the background”, has merely not yet been “discovered” by us, and therefore also fulfils both properties 1 (free of cost) and 2 (no decrease, no consumption). One example is so-called “space energy”, which was demonstrated experimentally by Prof. Claus Turtur (German).

But very practical devices that have been used successfully for decades (such as the wall-drying technology of the Aquapol company, which has been in use for over 30 years with what are now more than 50,000 satisfied customers) also point to a form of energy that conventional physics has not yet fully described (for background see e.g. ÖVR – ÖSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG FÜR RAUMENERGIE (Austrian Association for Space Energy, German)). PESWIKI offers a very comprehensive overview of current clean, inexhaustible energy sources.

Why are these possibilities not generally known or already in use?

Are the so-called conspiracy theorists right with their hypothesis that those who earn good money from scarce resources seek by every means to prevent the general use of clean, inexhaustible forms of energy? A very good account of this situation can be read here:

ARTICLE: BLOCKADEN GEGEN DIE FREIE ENERGIE (Blockades against free energy, German)

Are the foundations of conventional physics today even capable of describing and explaining a “free energy” (especially of the “3rd kind”, see above) and of fitting it meaningfully into their existing world view?

Einstein’s theory of relativity, in which Albert Einstein arbitrarily (as a so-called axiom) declared the speed of light to be the highest speed in the universe, has today been largely refuted because of its mathematical/logical contradictions. See for example:

WEBSITE: CHRISTOPH METTENHEIM (German) WEBSITE: EKKEHARD FRIEBE (German)

A chronological list of all historical critiques can be found in the work of more than 1,400 pages “G. O. Mueller – Über die absolute Größe der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie” (On the absolute magnitude of the special theory of relativity, German). Already in his first key work, “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper” (On the electrodynamics of moving bodies, Bern, June 1905), Einstein made a serious logical error. He develops his initial equations as follows:

This means that if the equation is actually to be formally correct, this would only be possible if v takes the value zero. That, however, would mean that the theory of relativity applies only in systems at rest (see his original publication, pp. 894, 896 and 897)!

PDF: ORIGINAL PUBLICATION (German)

In his later, more mature years Einstein himself was well aware of the shortcomings of his work, and by then he was also prepared to accept the ether as a medium of vibrations – a fact that conventional physics still likes to suppress. See for example:

EVERT – WEBSITE (German) EVERT – BOOKS (German)

Source: https://www.amazon.com/Philosophers-Stone-Alchemy-Secret-Research/dp/1932595406/

Today’s researchers, however, have already developed very interesting approaches to an “operationalisation of ether theory”. Vibrating ether, or (torus) vortices permanently present in this medium, could well explain a (background) form of energy that would make “free energy of the 3rd kind” possible.

If we now also bear in mind that as early as 1924 the renowned physicist Dr Walther Gerlach wrote “Die Verwandlung von Quecksilber in Gold – Moderne Alchemie” (The transformation of mercury into gold – modern alchemy), thereby addressing the transmutation of chemical elements without the release of radioactivity, then it becomes clear to us that “there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our philosophy”.

Conclusion

For reasons we can only speculate about (the greed for profit of company owners, fear of technologies too “powerful” for an “immature” humanity?), conventional physics has remained stuck deep in the 19th century, while technologies and human needs continue to develop rapidly. A comprehensive understanding of the (higher-dimensional) connections therefore requires a holistic approach that describes spirituality and material substance together (one example has been worked out by Noel Huntley: Noel Huntley).

To the readers of my article who enjoy experimenting, I therefore recommend not only crossing boundaries in theory but also building a few small “free energy applications” to find out for themselves whether “free energy” is possible or not:

VIDEO 1 VIDEO 2 VIDEO 3

I wish you illuminating insights!

With warm regards, Franz Hörmann

P.S.: On the subject of “forbidden knowledge”, a systemic constellation will take place on Tuesday, 5 June 2018, from 6 pm at “Heidis Zauberpark”, Dornbacherstraße 62, 1170 Vienna. I will give a short introductory talk there, and afterwards we will explore what is stored “in the background” about “forbidden knowledge”. I look forward to seeing you there!

EVENT: “VERBOTENES WISSEN” (Forbidden knowledge, German)

P.P.S.: Material criticising the theory of relativity, free to download:

DOWNLOAD: CRITIQUE OF THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY (German)

WHO I AM

Franz Hörmann, born 1960, Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr.

Employed since 1983 at the Institute for Auditing, Trust and Accounting of the Vienna University of Economics and Business, and a licensed management consultant since 1997.

• 1995–2015: corresponding member of the Data Processing Senate of the Austrian Chamber of Chartered Accountants
• 2001–2010: visiting professor at the Institute of Business Informatics (Communications Engineering) at the University of Linz
• 2001–2010: lecturer at the FHW (University of Applied Sciences of the Vienna Chamber of Commerce)
• 2001–2015: examiner in the training of chartered accountants at the Austrian Chamber of Chartered Accountants

First came to public attention in 2011 as a critic of interest-bearing debt money with his work “Das Ende des Geldes” (The end of money, German); he developed the new form of money “Informationsgeld” (information money, German) and is bringing it to market as OSBEEE:Money with the OSBEEE cooperative. Co-founder of the “Interdisciplinary Research Institute for Systemic Sciences” (IRISS). Franz Hörmann is married and the father of two children (daughter Sophie, born 1996; son Leonhard, born 1999).

CONTACT BY EMAIL MY WEBSITE (German) SUBSCRIBE TO MY NEWSLETTER (German)

In many areas, GAIA pursues the same goal as I do. So in December 2017 we decided to use GAIA as an information platform and to contribute a series of articles. I look forward to interacting actively with readers and interested people through GAIA and its network.